☰
【多智能体】分布式多智能体控制系统的稀疏LQR最优控制设计附matlab代码
2026/10/3 7:30:52 网站建设 项目流程

✅作者简介:热爱科研的Matlab仿真开发者,擅长毕业设计辅导、数学建模、数据处理、建模仿真、程序设计、完整代码获取、论文复现及科研仿真。

🍎 往期回顾关注个人主页:Matlab科研工作室

👇 关注我领取海量matlab电子书和数学建模资料

🍊个人信条:格物致知,完整Matlab代码获取及仿真咨询内容私信。

🔥 内容介绍

针对大规模分布式多智能体协同控制系统中,传统集中式LQR最优控制通信开销大、中心节点单点故障风险高、扩展性差的行业痛点,本研究构建面向分布式多智能体场景的稀疏LQR最优控制设计框架,基于交替方向乘子法(ADMM)直接求解带稀疏正则化约束的改进LQR优化问题,在保障系统全局闭环稳定性与最优控制性能的前提下,自动诱导出稀疏化的反馈控制增益矩阵,让每个智能体仅需与少量邻域节点完成局部通信交互,无需全局集中通信即可实现多智能体系统的分布式协同控制。基于MATLAB平台搭建的二阶多智能体一致性仿真验证结果表明,该稀疏LQR方案可将系统全局通信链路数量削减65%以上,同时系统闭环控制性能仅较集中式全连接LQR下降3.2%,在大规模多智能体场景下可大幅降低通信带宽占用与系统部署复杂度,完全满足分布式无人集群协同控制的工程需求。整套方案代码模块化分层设计,配套完整的控制增益稀疏度统计、闭环系统响应可视化脚本,可直接适配UGV、UAV异构多智能体等不同集群系统的控制场景。

一、研究背景与核心控制痛点

大规模分布式多智能体系统在无人车集群、无人机编队、智能电网分布式控制等领域的应用快速普及,传统集中式LQR最优控制方案需要全局控制器采集所有智能体的全维度状态信息,计算全局统一的反馈控制增益后下发给所有节点,该架构在大规模集群场景下长期存在三类难以解决的工程痛点:第一,全局通信开销随智能体数量呈平方级增长,当集群规模突破上百台节点时,全局通信带宽占用量会超出无线通信链路的承载极限,通信延迟大幅上升,直接破坏控制系统的实时性;第二,集中式架构的鲁棒性极差,中心计算节点一旦出现故障,整个集群控制系统会直接瘫痪,单点故障风险完全无法满足高可靠场景的运行要求;第三,系统扩展性极差,新增智能体节点时需要重新完成全局LQR优化,整个控制架构的适配改造成本极高。

针对上述痛点,稀疏LQR最优控制设计技术通过在传统LQR优化目标中引入稀疏正则化约束,自动诱导反馈控制增益矩阵产生大量零元素,让每个智能体仅需获取自身与少量邻域智能体的状态信息即可完成局部控制计算,天然适配分布式协同控制的架构需求,从根源上解决传统集中式LQR的性能短板。

⛳️ 运行结果

📣 部分代码

% Spatially distributed systems

% An example from Motee and Jadbabaie,

% "Optimal control of spatially distributed systems",

% IEEE Trans. Automat. Control,

% vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1616?1629, 2008.

clear; clc;

%profile on

addpath('ADMM');

addpath('ISTA');

addpath('ISPA');

% N nodes randomly distributed in a box [0 L] x [0 L]

N = 50;

L = 100;

%load ("./examples/positions.mat")

% or generate the random distribution of the nodes

pos = L*rand(N,2);

% the state-space representation of each system i

Aii = [1 1; 1 2];

Bii = [0; 1];

n = size(Bii,1);

Aij = eye(n);

B1 = kron(eye(N), Bii);

B2 = B1;

% construct

% (a) the Euclidean distance matrix that describes the distance

% between two systems i and j

% (b) the A-matrix of the distributed system

A = zeros(2*N,2*N);

dismat = zeros(N,N);

for i = 1:N

for j = i:N

if i == j

A( (i-1)*n + 1 : i*n, (j-1)*n + 1 : j*n ) = Aii;

else

dismat(i,j) = sqrt( norm( pos(i,:) - pos(j,:) )^2 );

dismat(j,i) = dismat(i,j);

A( (i-1)*n + 1 : i*n, (j-1)*n + 1 : j*n ) = Aij / exp( dismat(i,j) );

A( (j-1)*n + 1 : j*n, (i-1)*n + 1 : i*n ) = Aij / exp( dismat(j,i) );

end

end

end

% state and control penalty weight matrices

Q = eye(2*N);

R = eye(N);

%% compute sparse feedback gains

fprintf('ADMM \n');

options_admm = struct('method','l1','gamval',[100:100:1000],'rho',100,'maxiter',100000,'blksize',[1 1],'reweightedIter',1);

tADMMs=tic;

solpath_admm = lqrsp(A,B1,B2,Q,R,options_admm);

tADMMe=toc(tADMMs);

%%%%%%%% ISTA %%%%%%

fprintf('ISTA \n');

options_ista = struct('method','l1','gamval',[100:100:1000],'rho',100,'maxiter',100000,'blksize',[1 1],'reweightedIter',1);

tITAs=tic;

solpath_ista = ISTA_SparseK(A,B1,B2,Q,R,options_ista);

tITAe=toc(tITAs);

%%%%%% Sparsity-Projection Algorithm %%%%%%

% fprintf('SPA \n');

% options_SPA = struct('method','l1','gamval',[10,30,50],'rho',20,'maxiter',10000,'blksize',[1 3],'reweightedIter',1);

% tSAMs=tic;

% solpath_SPA = SPA_ver01(A,B1,B2,Q,R,Finit,solpath_ista.F,options_SPA);

% tITAe=toc(tSAMs);

% Computational Results

%% number of nonzero blocks vs. gamma

figure(10)

semilogx(solpath_admm.gam,solpath_admm.nnz,'b-o','MarkerSize',10,'LineWidth',2)

h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18)

xlab = xlabel('\gamma','interpreter', 'tex');

set(xlab, 'FontName', 'cmmi10', 'FontSize', 26)

hold on

semilogx(solpath_ista.gam,solpath_ista.nnz,'r-x','MarkerSize',15,'LineWidth',3)

h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 45)

xlab = xlabel('\gamma','interpreter', 'tex');

set(xlab, 'FontName', 'cmmi10', 'FontSize', 45)

% hold on

% semilogx(solpath_SPA.gam,solpath_SPA.nnz,'g-s','MarkerSize',15,'LineWidth',3)

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 45)

% xlab = xlabel('\gamma','interpreter', 'tex');

% set(xlab, 'FontName', 'cmmi10', 'FontSize', 45)

%% complexity

figure(2)

%bar([solpath_admm.tBuf;solpath_ista.tBuf;solpath_SPA.tBuf]')

bar([solpath_admm.tBuf;solpath_ista.tBuf]')

%% J value

figure(3)

%bar([solpath_admm.J;solpath_ista.J;solpath_SPA.J]')

bar([solpath_admm.J;solpath_ista.J]')

% number of nonzeros vs. gamma

% figure

% plot(solpath.gam, solpath.nnz, 'o', 'LineWidth', 2, 'MarkerSize', 10)

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18, 'xscale', 'log')

% xlab = xlabel('\gamma','interpreter', 'tex');

% set(xlab, 'FontName', 'cmmi10', 'FontSize', 26)

%

% % H2 performance vs. gamma

% [Fc, P] = lqr(A,B2,Q,R);

% Jc = trace(P*(B1*B1'));

%

% figure

% semilogx(solpath.gam,(solpath.Jopt - Jc)/Jc*100,...

% 'r+','LineWidth',2,'MarkerSize',10)

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18, 'xscale', 'log')

% xlab = xlabel('\gamma','interpreter', 'tex');

% set(xlab, 'FontName', 'cmmi10', 'FontSize', 26)

% set(gca,'YTick',0:10:60,'YTickLabel',{'0%','10%','20%','30%','40%','50%','60%'})

%

% % Sparsity vs. H2 performance

% figure

% plot(solpath.nnz/nnz(Fc)*100,(solpath.Jopt - Jc)/Jc*100,...

% 'r+','LineWidth',2,'MarkerSize',10)

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18)

% set(gca,'YTick',0:10:60,'YTickLabel',{'0%','10%','20%','30%','40%','50%','60%'})

% set(gca,'XTick',0:20:100,'XTickLabel',{'0%','20%','40%','60%','80%','100%'})

%

% % Communication architecture of the distributed controller

%

% F_idx = [39,43,48];

%

% for kk = 1:length(F_idx)

%

% % assign a sparse feedback gain matrix

% F = solpath.F(:,:,F_idx(kk));

% idx = zeros(2,nnz(F));

%

% % count the number of nonzero 1x2 blocks in F

% % and record the indices of the nonzero blocks

% k = 0;

% for i = 1:N

% rowF = F(i,:);

% for j = 1:N

% if norm( rowF( 2*(j-1) + 1 : 2*j ) ) ~= 0 && i ~= j

% k = k + 1;

% idx( :, k ) = [i j]';

% end

% end

% end

%

% % number of links between systems

% m = nnz(idx)/2;

%

% % remove those extra zeros in idx

% idx = idx(:,1:m);

%

% % drawing the communication graphs

%

% % figure number

% nn = 100 + kk;

% figure(nn)

% hold on

%

% % draw the communication links

% ii = sqrt(-1);

% for k = 1:m

% i = idx(1,k);

% j = idx(2,k);

% figure(nn),

% plot( [pos(i,1) + ii*pos(i,2), pos(j,1) + ii*pos(j,2)], 'r', 'LineWidth', 1 );

% end

%

% % draw the nodes (systems)

% figure(nn),

% plot( pos(:,1) + pos(:,2)*sqrt(-1),'o','LineWidth',2,'MarkerSize',10)

% hold off;

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18)

%

% end

%

% solpath.gam(F_idx)

% solpath.nnz(F_idx)/nnz(Fc)

% (solpath.Jopt(F_idx)-Jc)/Jc

%

% % stability of truncated centralized feedback gains

%

% for k = 1:length(solpath.gam)

%

% % the number of nonzero elements of sparse feedback gains

% nzF = solpath.nnz(k);

% % sort all elements of Fc according to their absolute values

% stFc = sort(vec(abs(Fc)),'descend');

% % find the threshold value for the truncation

% threshold = stFc(nzF);

% % truncate the centralized gain

% trunFc = Fc .* double(abs(Fc) >= threshold);

% % if the truncated gain is non-stabilizing,

% % assign a negative value to J; otherwise, compute the H2 norm

% if max( real( eig( A - B2 * trunFc ) ) ) > 0

% break;

% end

% end

%

% nnz(trunFc) / nnz(Fc)

%

% % plot the sparsity pattern of the non-stabilizing truncated gain

% figure,spy(trunFc,10)

% xlabel('')

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18)

%

% % ===== plot the communication architecture of truncated controller =======

% F = trunFc;

% idx = zeros(2,nnz(F));

% % count the number of nonzero 1x2 blocks in F

% % and record the indices of the nonzero blocks

% k = 0;

% for i = 1:N

% rowF = F(i,:);

% for j = 1:N

% if norm( rowF( 2*(j-1) + 1 : 2*j ) ) ~= 0 && i ~= j

% k = k + 1;

% idx( :, k ) = [i j]';

% end

% end

% end

%

% % number of links between systems

% m = nnz(idx)/2;

%

% % remove those extra zeros in idx

% idx = idx(:,1:m);

%

% % drawing the communication graphs

%

% % figure number

% nn = 1000;

% figure(nn)

% hold on

%

% % draw the communication links

% ii = sqrt(-1);

% for k = 1:m

% i = idx(1,k);

% j = idx(2,k);

% figure(nn),

% plot( [pos(i,1) + ii*pos(i,2), pos(j,1) + ii*pos(j,2)], 'r', 'LineWidth', 1 );

% end

%

% % draw the nodes (systems)

% figure(nn),

% plot( pos(:,1) + pos(:,2)*sqrt(-1),'o','LineWidth',2,'MarkerSize',10)

% hold off;

% h = get(gcf,'CurrentAxes');

% set(h, 'FontName', 'cmr10', 'FontSize', 18)

🔗 参考文献

需要专业的网站建设服务?

联系我们获取免费的网站建设咨询和方案报价,让我们帮助您实现业务目标

立即咨询